Our use of cookies

Some cookies are necessary for us to manage how our website behaves while other optional, or non-necessary, cookies help us to analyse website usage. You can Accept All or Reject All optional cookies or control individual cookie types below.

You can read more in our Cookie Notice


These cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

Analytical cookies help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage.

Third-Party Cookies

These cookies are set by a website other than the website you are visiting usually as a result of some embedded content such as a video, a social media share or a like button or a contact map



Research Fellow

Dr David McMillan

BSc, MPhil, PhD

David McMillan, BSc, MPhil, PhD, studied at the University of Ulster, the Irish Baptist College, Queen’s University Belfast and the VU Amsterdam. He was minister in two Baptist churches in Ireland over a period of twenty years. He later worked on behalf of the International Baptist Theological Seminary Prague and managed its transition into the International Baptist Theological Study Centre Amsterdam where he is a research fellow. He has served as a mission worker for BMS World Mission and is a director of Irish Baptist Networks.


His most recent publication is Convictions, Conflict, and Moral Reasoning: A Baptist Perspective with a Case Study on Northern Ireland. Vol: 1 in Amsterdam Studies in Baptist and Mennonite Theology.

The primary focus of the book is to bring to the fore the contribution of McClendon and Smith’s work on convictions and the application of that work in helping understand the processes of moral reasoning in the context of conflict. Both were indebted to Zuurdeeg, and their concept was incorporated in models of moral reasoning by Baptist scholars Glen Stassen and Parush Parushev. The usefulness of the concept is critically evaluated.

The volume concludes with a case study on the conflict in Northern Ireland, including the role of religion and the key issues raised in the referendum on the Belfast Agreement in 1998. It includes an examination of the contribution of four Christian groups in Northern Ireland who publicly engaged in this six-week period of intense and passionate debate on the Agreement and the difficult issues it addressed, as the focus for examining and testing the application of the model of moral reasoning. On the basis of the case study is demonstrated that the concept of convictions can prove to be a helpful means of getting to the heart of what drives moral reasoning in contexts of conflict.

The purpose of this book is to issue a call to engage with, critique, and consider the importance and application of a much undervalued methodological approach to discerning the convictions that are the primary influencers of thought and action.